Jockey Men's Underwear Classic Full Rise Brief - 12 Pack

Been wearing Jockeys for years. These briefs purchased though Amazon now have holes in the seat after six months use. Material seems to be thinner than it used to be. Very disappointed and surprised that Jockey appears to cheapening the brand. These are the first twelve pack I've purchased - previous purchases were all three packs bought in retail outlets. Is Jockey using a different product for its Amazon sales? Watch out. I'll not buy these through Amazon again.

I've been wearing many different briefs over the last 10 years. The Jockey classics I found at Costco a couple years ago are my favorites, and I'd like to buy more. When I saw these on Amazon, I thought I'd buy enough to last a while. Unfortunately, these are not the same.The "34" waist briefs I bought here are huge. I had to double check the label, thinking I received the wrong package. Nope. I guess "34" means something else now?The waistband is made of some sort of scratchy material. Stitching looks uneven. Overall, these are a cheap knock-off of the real classic Jockeys. Either Jockey decided to cash in on their name, or they do vertical marketing with differing quality briefs. Buyer beware!If you're into self-flagellation and want lots of expansion room, these are the briefs for you. If you're looking for quality briefs that feel good wearing, keep looking. There may even be other Jockey offerings that are wearable.

Took one star off, only because like Jockey's T-shirts, the quality has been reduced due to using thinner material as compared to years ago. It seems all of the major underwear manufacturers are doing this to cut costs at the expense of quality and longevity. I'm back to trying Jockey once again because various brands of other underwear that I've purchased over the past couple of years have proved disappointing in the waist bands.The material of the body and bands hasn't worn out but the waistbands have stretched out prematurely, to the point where they keep falling down from my waist. Time will tell if these Jockey's do the same.

The simple front-fold brief fly men grew up with last century seems to be an endangered species now. And the industry hasn't figured out a way to indicate the differences in their advertising. I have no idea what Jockey means by "Classic Full Rise", but any brief that leaves you searching for the fly is not the answer. I advise figuring this out before you buy (unless you always sit down).

I’ve been wearing this product for decades. However, several of the briefs in this 12-pack have tags in the back that irritate the skin. Never had this problem with the normal 3-packs that I buy in stores. Makes me wonder if these are irregulars bundled up to sell cheaply.

I ordered these because I used to use Fruit of the Loom or Hanes, but they have become so thin that they last no time. They do seem a bit more durable than the aforementioned brands, but not by much. I think they will last the year that I keep them. It seems there are not many choices between cheap junk and really expensive.

Jockey seems the be the only mainstream underwear brand that still understands that many of us do not fit into the S-M-L paradigm. Their product fits me perfectly.

Unfortunately, like other top name companies, Jockey has downgraded the quality of its products. These briefs are much, much thinner than the last batch I bought for my husband. They are soft, but even in the crotch where the fabric is doubled, they seem so thin. We will keep thm only because it ti too much of a hassle to return.