Order now to get it by: Sunday July 02 - Tuesday July 04
Get it on Saturday July 1st with expedited shipping.
Select the expedited delivery option after adding this item to your cart.
Product ID: 810871
In a time when educators and politicians in the United States are fumbling for a fix--from vouchers to smaller class
sizes--for ailing public schools, it's refreshing to read the more sophisticated take on what can be done to improve
American education found in The Teaching Gap, a straightforward analysis of approaches towards teaching around the
world. James W. Stigler, a UCLA psychology professor, and James Hiebert, an education professor at the University of
Delaware, argue that America's culture of teaching needs to be changed before we see any real change in student
achievement--and they're not simply talking about higher pay and more respect.
The bulk of The Teaching Gap examines the cultural differences among teaching methods, with detailed accounts of video
observations of eighth-grade math teachers that were part of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, or
TIMSS (which Stigler directed). American teachers in the videos tend to emphasize terms and procedures, thinking of math
as a set of tedious skills. They try to interest students with praise and real-life problems. In contrast, Japanese
teachers are more likely to emphasize ideas, expecting the concepts alone to stir students' natural curiosity. They
weave together lessons that have a distinct beginning, middle, and end. Teachers in the other countries are more likely
to share lessons on what works in the classroom and receive more sophisticated training, the authors found. Only seven
out of 41 nations scored lower than the U.S. in TIMSS, placing American eighth-graders with those from Cyprus, Portugal,
South Africa, Kuwait, Iran, and Colombia. Without falling into teacher-bashing mode, Stigler and Hiebert insist that
reform efforts need to originate with teachers, not university researchers. They call for overhauling the teaching
profession with stricter requirements, better peer review, and more demanding academic standards, as well as improved
interaction between teachers. Their detailed examination of the study's video observations gets to the heart of the
matter and should be worthwhile reading for educators, policymakers, and anyone interested in the condition of today's
education system. --Jodi Mailander Farrell